Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2968

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Party Roles and my cleric that doesn't fit in
Recent Chat Activity (Main Lobby)
Join Chat

Loading Chat Log...

Prefer not to see ads? Become a Community Supporter.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Party Roles and my cleric that doesn't fit in

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Brighton
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,362
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Party Roles and my cleric that doesn't fit in

    Prefer not to see ads?
    Become a Community Supporter.
    So I have been doing a lot of thinking about the effectiveness of our PC group and how we work as a team, mostly because I am at a loss as to how Tirsa (the cleric) fits in and how I can play her effectively.

    4th edition offers up PC "roles" and reading up on them I think they make a lot of sense (more so than the defined 3.5 roles of Fighter, Cleric, Rogue, and Mage) and have been critical in looking at how our party operates.

    First, there are 4 roles, Leader, Defender, Striker, and Controller.

    (the following is just my take on what I have read, all of this may actually be different when 4th edition is released)

    The Leader is the party's "face", healer, booster, and option giver. Currently Ithilden (the Paladin) and Strumble (the bard) fill the "face" role and very well. Tirsa is obviously the healer, yet Strumble and Ithilden can provide some needed healing. Strumble fills the roles of booster and option giver (haste). I would put all 3 of us in this role, with it being Strumble's primary role.

    Next is the Defender, this is the PC that engages the enemy in melee and is the heavy damage dealer. This is obviously Ithilden with Tirsa coming a close second. I would still however put this as Ithilden's primary role.

    Striker is the one who can out-maneuver the enemies and deal "secondary" damage. So while Ithilden is engaged in melee and Strumble is boosting, Jahde (the Sorcerer/Rogue) is bouncing around dealing "support" damage and trying to cut off enemies that maybe trying to out-maneuver us. Jahde and his levels of Sorcerer/Rogue fills this role nicely!

    Last is the Controller, this is the character that is controlling the battle field by cutting off or limiting enemies options with big area attacks, walls and etc... Tirsa can do a little of this with Flame Strike and maybe Sound Burst but none of us can really "own" this role.

    So as you can see, there isn't really a clearly defined role or place for Tirsa and I think this is the trouble I am having with playing her. While she does manage to cover a wide range of roles she is still not necessarily needed, and thats fine. I never REALLY wanted to be a cleric anyway I was simply filling the roles that were left open. My ideal character would be a Ranger who would probably be another Defender or Striker or a Wizard who would fill the role of Controller. Not that I am trying to pigeon-hole any of us into particular roles, but simply that this is a good way to look at our party and the way I am feeling about my character.

    As a healer there are plenty of magic items to invest in to replace this role.
    As a defender she has enough Hp and a high enough AC to soak some damage and keep enemies distracted but just isn't a big damage dealer without being boosted to do so.
    Then as a controller all she really has is Flame Strike. Most of her other spells are selected to heal and boost the party should they need it or to expend as healing spells.

    So what I am looking for is some feed back on how to play an effective Cleric or if I should switch up characters and play a Ranger or a Wizard?

    One option would be to invest in magic items that allow my cleric to fill one particular role. I am just no sure what magic items would do this. I am leaning toward the Controller but I feel a cleric's options are limited in that field. Also I am just not that familiar with clerical spells and magic items to know what combos I can optimize the best.

    I have always played her as a fighter because thats what the party needed when I joined as well as some healing. Now that thats not needed too much anymore there is really no need for her.
    "I'm afraid it is you who are mistaken. About a great, many things."

    "It is not the rules that make or break a game, it's the GM and the players."


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Jordan
    Posts
    5,273
    Blog Entries
    41
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    i must disagree. you could fill the battlefield control slot much more effectively. as a cleric you have access to a lot more spells than just flamestrike, and that's an offensive spell, not a control spell at all.

    if you can cast fifth level spell, at least, then you have the following options from the players handbook:

    5th: command, greater; dispel (alignment); hallow(prep only); insect plague; symbol; wall of stone.

    4th: control water, dimensional anchor, dismissal, freedom of movement.

    3rd: deeper darkness; dispel; magic circle.

    2nd: darkness; enthrall; hold person; silence; spiritual weapon.

    1st: cause fear; command; obscuring mist; sanctuary.

    plus the summoning spells, and the buff spells are all handy. not to mention cool stuff from the spell compendium: wall of dispel magic, symbol of spell loss, mass sanctuary, earth reaver, curse of ill fortune, blistering radience, wall of (alignment), wall of sand, wrack, wall of light, ring of blades, and more.

    all of these can be used to affect the battlefield in different ways, from barring passage to making it difficult to hit to damaging opponents and more. make sure you pick your ground to give yourselves the advantage too!

    or you could pick a different role entirely, if you wanted. just some thoughts. =D
    nijineko the gm: AG16, CoS. nijineko the player: AtG, RttToH; . The Journal of Tala'elowar Kiyiik! .
    CrystalBallLite: the best dice roller on the planet! . nijineko the archivist: the 3.x archive

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bothell
    Age
    41
    Posts
    678
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    What spheres does your Cleric have? That might modify your role some as well.

    Developer for Darkage Warlord, a Pen & Paper Games exclusive Medieval Wargame.

    If you are in the DC metro area and like to trade D&D minis (1.0 or 2.0), please send me a PM!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Stroudsburg
    Age
    35
    Posts
    903
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Maelstrom View Post
    What spheres does your Cleric have? That might modify your role some as well.
    Ditto. You don't have to fill your entire spell list with just Cure spells. When I play cleric I have one cure spell per level, as well as a Healer's Kit and several potions or Wands that held Cure spells.

    In PHB 2, there are other themes, suggested Backgrounds as well as Suggested Personality Archetypes. Maybe one of those will give you an idea to go on? They have Divine feats in the PHB2, so maybe one of those can help you as well.

    I would also recommend looking at Complete Divine, Defenders of the Faith and the Spell Compendium, for more spells and/or ideas on how to improve your cleric.
    There's nothing to fear except fear itself and, of course, the boogeyman.

    Co-Organizer of NEPA D&D and Stroudsburg Geeks. Member of Stroudsburg Area Gaming Association.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Maptool
    Age
    46
    Posts
    145
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Anaesthesia View Post
    Ditto. You don't have to fill your entire spell list with just Cure spells. When I play cleric I have one cure spell per level, as well as a Healer's Kit and several potions or Wands that held Cure spells.
    If you channel good energy, you shouldn't have to prep any cure spells. Clerics can convert any non-domain spell to a cure (or inflict if you rebuke) spell spontaneously.


    It sounds to me like Inquisitor's group just isn't getting pounded hard enough. Don't you ever need to start laying down the big healing spells to keep your front lines alive? Is your healing done out of combat, for the most part?
    Contact me via PM -- email from this site isn't working for me.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Brighton
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,362
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I think we have solved the problem.

    The player for the bard suggest I try to be the controller and so I am going to focus on that. He is buying me a Peripat of Wisdom +6!!!

    Her domains are Good and Healing.

    I don't ever prepare any cure spells but I have been sitting with bull's str and bear's endurance waiting for a chance to use them.

    All healing happens outside of combat. I rarely heal during combat.

    I have the complete divine, defenders of the faith, spell compendium, divine champion, etc...

    I think I just need to read over the spells and choose from there.

    *Edit: I think part of the problem was that I was having to fill roles in the party as players were coming and going. Now that we have a steady group I can focus on one aspect.

    I'm feeling better about the character now. and not just because of the wisdom +6!

    Please keep the suggestions coming!
    Last edited by Inquisitor Tremayne; 02-13-2008 at 04:36 PM.
    "I'm afraid it is you who are mistaken. About a great, many things."

    "It is not the rules that make or break a game, it's the GM and the players."


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Stroudsburg
    Age
    35
    Posts
    903
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DrAwkward View Post
    If you channel good energy, you shouldn't have to prep any cure spells. Clerics can convert any non-domain spell to a cure (or inflict if you rebuke) spell spontaneously.
    I know that. I just like being completely annoying/paranoid and having at the very least one prepared anyway, out of all my spells (even if its just a cure light).
    Last edited by Anaesthesia; 02-13-2008 at 04:47 PM.
    There's nothing to fear except fear itself and, of course, the boogeyman.

    Co-Organizer of NEPA D&D and Stroudsburg Geeks. Member of Stroudsburg Area Gaming Association.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bothell
    Age
    41
    Posts
    678
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Hmm, thought about multiclassing? Mystic Theurges are awfully tempting, especially if you do a lot of your healing outside of combat...

    Just 3 wizard levels and you qualify. You could even go specialist evoker for the extra spells since you've got the other side covered.

    Developer for Darkage Warlord, a Pen & Paper Games exclusive Medieval Wargame.

    If you are in the DC metro area and like to trade D&D minis (1.0 or 2.0), please send me a PM!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Maptool
    Age
    46
    Posts
    145
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Anaesthesia View Post
    I know that. I just like being completely annoying/paranoid and having at the very least one prepared anyway, out of all my spells (even if its just a cure light).
    Never a bad idea to be paranoid.

    Usually I only prepare them if I want a metamagic feat on them, so they don't face the sorceror casting-time restriction.
    Contact me via PM -- email from this site isn't working for me.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dearborn
    Posts
    7,395
    Blog Entries
    16
    Downloads
    9
    Uploads
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquisitor Tremayne View Post
    So I have been doing a lot of thinking about the effectiveness of our PC group and how we work as a team, mostly because I am at a loss as to how Tirsa (the cleric) fits in and how I can play her effectively.

    4th edition offers up PC "roles" and reading up on them I think they make a lot of sense (more so than the defined 3.5 roles of Fighter, Cleric, Rogue, and Mage) and have been critical in looking at how our party operates.

    First, there are 4 roles, Leader, Defender, Striker, and Controller.
    Too small a toolbox. There are many many more "roles" that are being offered here. Finding your own nitch is part of what the game is about. The above lens is looking entirely through combat as if combat was the be all end all of the game.

    There e are not four roles. There never have been "four roles" there never will be "four roles". Pigeons fit in pigeonholes. Don't be a pigeon. There are as many roles as you have the skill and imagination to create.

    Garry AKA --Phoenix-- Rising above the Flames.
    My favorite game console is a table and chairs.
    The Olde Phoenix Inn

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    1,422
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Get a lesser metamagic rod of reach. Any touch spell becomes a ranged touch spell for those moving characters in combat. It is cheap and effective without boosting the level of your minor buffing and healing spells.
    Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Jordan
    Posts
    5,273
    Blog Entries
    41
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    ah yes, along with the excellent suggestion of metamagic rods, may i also suggest runestaffs as a way of expanding your on-hand selection.

    hmmm, i don't think i ever prepare cure type spells. now, heal and restores, on the other hand.... i usually dump the 0-level spells on cure if i need to stabilize someone.
    nijineko the gm: AG16, CoS. nijineko the player: AtG, RttToH; . The Journal of Tala'elowar Kiyiik! .
    CrystalBallLite: the best dice roller on the planet! . nijineko the archivist: the 3.x archive

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Maptool
    Age
    46
    Posts
    145
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rabkala View Post
    Get a lesser metamagic rod of reach. Any touch spell becomes a ranged touch spell for those moving characters in combat. It is cheap and effective without boosting the level of your minor buffing and healing spells.
    If you are using the healing spell spontanously, it's still a full-round action to cast, even with the rod, no?
    Contact me via PM -- email from this site isn't working for me.


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    1,422
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I was under the impression it was a standard action. Spontaneous casting takes no extra time. The metamagic rods power the spell and only sorcs must make it a full round action, I believe. Either way, it fits his idea of his character role. All the metamagic rods are great. Get a bunch of them; reach, substitution, shaping, enlargement, silence, extension, etc. They are a great bang for your buck and can really come in handy.
    Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Brighton
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,362
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I'm just waiting to see if our DM will let us retrain feats. If yes then I will pick up Extend Spell at 10th, Persistent Spell at 11th, Scribe Scroll and Reach Spell at 12th.

    I think it is all coming down to spell selection really. I think the group as a whole has been under utilizing each persons potential.
    "I'm afraid it is you who are mistaken. About a great, many things."

    "It is not the rules that make or break a game, it's the GM and the players."


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [D&D] Design & Development: PC Roles
    By PnP News Bot in forum News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-04-2007, 01:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •