Recent Chat Activity (Main Lobby)
Join Chat

Loading Chat Log...

Prefer not to see ads? Become a Community Supporter.
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-29-2014, 10:10 AM
    Wow, some people take things way too seriously. I could never torture my dice like that, imagine how poorly they'd roll afterwards?
    10 replies | 218 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-28-2014, 10:56 AM
    Trash it with supplemental material? How can you not like supplemental material?
    35 replies | 1195 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-28-2014, 10:50 AM
    This makes me want to roll every dice I have with an excel spreadsheet ready to record and find their averages. Which, I guess, means "yes" we believe in diminishing probability? If you have a record of the last 50 rolls of a dice, and are familiar with the results before rolling, and you feel...
    10 replies | 218 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-27-2014, 06:25 PM
    Does that actually exist? Well... apparently so. Interesting way to adjust the probability of a roll. But after a few bored moments of staring at d20's I think they're built against that type of thing. The 2 and 8 sides are next to the 20. It might be possible to use Dice Control on a...
    10 replies | 218 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-27-2014, 01:10 PM
    Some people have that special dice that most recently rolled a NAT 1, meaning its less likely to roll a 1 again in the future because the odds that it rolls 1 twice are 1/400 right? How true is that, or is it just superstition? This is basically the same as the old "flip a coin three times"...
    10 replies | 218 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-26-2014, 11:59 PM
    Simpler. Basically "an armor by any other name would still add +X Defense, so why do we have a bunch of tables listing various armor names and the one point of difference between them when not naming them would work just as well, save page space in print, and be easier to record on a character...
    11 replies | 217 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-26-2014, 08:53 AM
    This is the plan. I'd rather not have three separate boxes on a character sheet for Slashing, Bashing, and Piercing defense. I'd rather give armor a Damage Reduction to the one(s) its resistant to and keep it simple. (Same for damage types like Fire / Arcane / Acid etc.)
    11 replies | 217 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-25-2014, 09:38 PM
    Like I mentioned in the second post, incorporating specific protections against damage types isn't hard with the proposed rules-lite version, and was of course going to be included either way. Realism is a good place to start, but when it gets in the way of function it can be sacrificed without...
    11 replies | 217 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-24-2014, 08:36 PM
    Well that (the specific damage type protection) is still applicable. Generic armor that provides only a +# AR would be the standard, but also available would be armors that provide damage redcution from certain types of attacks. Bashing, Slashing, Fire, Acid, and so on. So you're not missing out on...
    11 replies | 217 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-24-2014, 05:05 PM
    So in D&D and however many other RPGs there are a plethora of armors, not really much different from one another. Scale Mail. Breastplate, and Banded Mail all have their "how they were made and what of" text blocks, but statistically the armor rating difference is usually by one point. So why even...
    11 replies | 217 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-22-2014, 08:16 AM
    There's PLENTY of good material in there. SCP-093 and the various "color" tests made with it could probably last long enough to play a handful of sessions at least, or even be a full campaign on its own.
    2 replies | 173 view(s)
  • Soft Serve's Avatar
    09-22-2014, 08:11 AM
    Soft Serve replied to a thread Chat is Broken For Me in Feedback
    Sucks, but I'm glad it's not an issue on my end. Unless this is all some elaborate ruse put on by you, the most cowardly of rogues. Or the most roguish of cowards... I can't tell sometimes.
    6 replies | 271 view(s)
No More Results
About Jscottwsy91

Basic Information

Location
City:
Raleigh
State:
North Carolina
Zipcode:
27606
Country:
US
Willing to Travel:
10 miles
Availability
LFG/LFP:
LFG
Availability (Days):
Friday, Saturday, Sunday
Availability (Times):
Mornings, Afternoons, Evenings
Desired Gaming Frequency:
Weekly - Once per week
Gaming Preferences
Player/GM:
Player
Preferred Genres:
Fantasy
Favorite RPGs:
Dungeons & Dragons
Preferred Playing Style:
75% Combat / 25% Roleplaying
Ideal Group Size:
Medium Groups (Between 4 and 6 players)
Online RPGs?:
Yes
What are you looking for?:
Hey I am over at NC State and I am looking to get back into the game. I have alot of 3.5 books and my own dice.
About Me
Biography:
I have not played many and I am kinda rusty on how to play, I can play around once a week

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3
Posts Per Day
0.00
Downloads
Downloads
0
Uploads
0
General Information
Last Activity
02-08-2013 09:49 PM
Join Date
05-05-2009
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. Soft Serve Soft Serve is offline

    Cascade Failure FTW

    • Send a message via AIM to Soft Serve
    Soft Serve
  2. Windstar
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2