Recent Chat Activity (Main Lobby)
Join Chat

Loading Chat Log...

Prefer not to see ads? Become a Community Supporter.
View RSS Feed

Inside lives a goblin that feeds on indecision.

Numenera Stream-of-Consciousness Quasi-Review

Rate this Entry
So far I've read the Player's Guide and skipped through the core book. I'm not sure whether I like Numenera or not.

The central mechanics are pretty cool:

  • The system requires only three dice: a d20, a d6, and a d100. (OK, a d100 is two dice unless one is brave/stupid enough to use a Zocchihedron.)
  • Every challenge -- from combat to a steep climb to a seduction -- has a Rating from 0 to 10. 0 is trivial, an automatic success; 10 is nigh-impossible. To beat a challenge, players must roll Rating x 3 on a d20. Note that a challenge rating higher than 6 will automatically fail.
  • Players can lower the challenge rating by applying skills, using equipment, activating special powers, or exerting Effort, which is a finite resource. Each level of skill (one or two) or point of Effort lowers the challenge rating one point. If the challenge rating is 0, players succeed automatically. A few items or abilities add +1 or +2 to the die roll; every +3 is equivalent to lowering the challenge rating.
  • A natural 19 produces a special success (if it's a success) and a 20 even more so. (17 and 18 also have special effects in combat.) A 1 means the GM can introduce an extra complication.
  • Notably, only players roll the d20. When an NPC attacks, players make a defense roll against the NPC's attack Rating. For simplicity, most NPCs and monsters have a single Rating for attack, defense, and other abilities.
  • The d6 is used occasionally to generate random numbers: points healed, duration of an effect, etc.
  • The GM rolls a d100 to generate random events, only if he wants to.
  • Players gain XP for discovery and other story actions, or for letting the GM complicate their lives (a la FATE). They can spend XP to cancel a complication, re-roll the die, gain a specific or temporary advantage, and of course improve their characters.

That's it for the basics. But how does a character gain skills, acquire powers, or exert Effort? What are the limits of each? What are "numenera"? That's where the bulk of the system comes in, and it somewhat resembles a D&D class and level system. Essentially one chooses a "type" -- glaive (enhanced fighter), nano (techno-wizard), or jack (rogues or glaive/nano hybrids) -- plus two other elements that bring extra skills, options, powers, and limitations. Characters also have three ability pools -- Might, Speed, and Intellect -- with base values and free points depending on one's type. Characters use up points from an appropriate pool to use fighting moves (glaives), esoteries (nanos), or tricks (jacks), or to expend Effort up to the limits of one's Tier. Gaining a Tier opens up new skills, moves/esoteries/tricks, and other abilities. "Numenera" are essentially scavenged magi-tech items: artifacts, one-use cyphers (up to a maximum determined by type and Tier), or useless but interesting oddities.

The "central mechanics" are the selling point for me, while the Types, Tiers, Pools, Moves, Esoteries, Tricks, and so forth leave me cold. It's like running hack-and-slash games in FATE, or writing a COBOL emulator in LISP, or house-ruling Go. Some gamers may like or need that extra layer of rules, powers, and toys. I, however, gravitate toward the "indie" philosophy of small, focused rule sets and "old school" styles where imaginative solutions trump lists of pre-defined abilities. (They're not so incompatible.) If Monte Cook had stopped with the bullet-pointed list above, I'd be more than happy ... but then he wouldn't be able to sell a 400+ page book of rules and art, much less a multimedia franchise.

Submit "Numenera Stream-of-Consciousness Quasi-Review" to Digg Submit "Numenera Stream-of-Consciousness Quasi-Review" to Submit "Numenera Stream-of-Consciousness Quasi-Review" to StumbleUpon Submit "Numenera Stream-of-Consciousness Quasi-Review" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Farcaster's Avatar
    What were your thoughts about the setting itself?
  2. fmitchell's Avatar
    Again I'm split. On the one hand, the idea of questing for runes, I mean numenera, answers the "what do players do" pretty neatly without "kill the monsters grab the loot". Notably, numenera are "plot coupons": dig up this old junk, maybe jerry-rig something to escape the current predicament, and haul the rest off to trade for *shins*, goods, and whuffie. The magi-tech setting also allows a mix of medieval fantasy, post-apocalypse, and science fiction. (Like Monte Cook I'm also a fan of The Book of the New Sun; I tend more toward Jack Vance's Planet of Adventure and other sword-and-planet series than the Dying Earth, though.)

    On the other hand, hundreds of pages of detailed setting made my eyes glaze over. I would have preferred a few pages of adventure seeds, micro-settings, and random weirdness tables. Also, the amount of invented lingo seems hokey, verging on "Call A Rabbit a Smeerp".
    Updated 01-23-2014 at 05:16 AM by fmitchell