[Shadowrun] Seattle

[Freejack]

I'm hesitant to do this, partly because while I've been interested in Shadowrun since 1st Edition, I have really been playing only the past couple of years. Lots of reading in the past but with no players, that was the extent of my gaming.

I don't want to step on toes but I am interested in the difference because people have been asking. So I'll be blogging a look at the four Seattle books (and parts of books).

It's a combination of a review and a comparison.

I was going to post it here, but my free time is pretty narrow at times and I don't think I'd be able to keep a thread going enough to have it stay at the front page. I think a blog would be a better medium, and perhaps when I'm done, I can reformat and rewrite it into a thread for the forum(s).

http://www.shadowtalk.us/?p=112

You're welcome to drop in and check it out as I go along. But it may be days between updates :)

Carl

[MortonStromgal]

Awesome! :) I like what you have so far. For me New Seattle was a big disapointment. It wasnt bad it just didnt have the fluff of the 1e book.

[Freejack]

I've done a little editing of the first post and will continue as long as I figure new things out.

The second installment is available now.

http://www.shadowtalk.us/?p=114

Let me know what you think. I think it's a tiny bit jumbled as I read and assimilate the information. I'm sure I'll rewrite it once I'm done since I also want to do a good review.

Carl

[Freejack]

New posting for the folks following along at home.

http://www.shadowtalk.us/?p=135

Carl

[MortonStromgal]

These are very informative, keep it up! :D